During the session at the John F. Kennedy Jr. Forum at the Institute of Politics at HKS, dozens of vocal protestors marched outside, upset at the threat to DACA protections for thousands of young people if Congress fails to reach an agreement soon. They also are concerned that Democratic lawmakers may not push through legislation to counter the administration’s desired limits on immigration.

Ironically, it was Durbin who, along with Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), in 2001 co-sponsored the original Development Relief Education for Alien Minors Act for which “the Dreamers” are named. Their bill offered conditional residency to qualifying undocumented children while giving them a pathway to permanent status.

When the bill did not pass, Durbin later turned to President Barack Obama, his former Senate colleague, and urged him to help those who would have been shielded by the DREAM Act. The result was the DACA program.

In early September, Trump terminated future legal protections under the program. Congress has until March 5 to pass legislation to replace it and get it signed into law. If lawmakers cannot do so, Durbin said, 1,000 people will begin to lose their protected status every day, with nearly 300,000 losing protection by the end of this year. The same number will lose that status next year, he said.

A College student with DACA status said she felt “guilty” that Congress may agree to legislation that would give her a 10-year conditional path to citizenship, but do so in exchange for $25 billion to build a border wall and boost immigration patrols that would affect other undocumented people. She asked Durbin how Democrats could justify even considering such a Faustian trade with Republicans.

Noting that it takes 60 votes to pass any major legislation in the Senate, Durbin said with 49 Democrats and 51 Republicans, the math is not in their favor. “I don’t have the votes for a clean DREAM Act,” he said.

As students voiced their anger, frustration, and fear over what may happen to their status, Durbin urged the Forum audience, which was made up mostly of undergraduates, to channel their energy into political action, including protesting and, most importantly, voting.

“I believe this issue of immigration is the Civil Rights issue of our time,” said Durbin. Political opponents are “preaching a gospel on immigration which doesn’t reflect who we are or what we can be. Now’s our time to speak up.”