Ruth Sager should be remembered above all as a gifted, original and imaginative scientist who loved her life of exploring nature and in her later years brought her gifts and passion to investigating the scourge of breast cancer.

Ruth Sager
Ruth Sager: Her work was marked by boldness, originality, thoughtfulness, and enthusiasm. It brought her great pleasure, which she graciously shared with those who knew her.

Her discovery of science came through an epiphany. She enrolled at the University of Chicago with the intention to study music or literature. The University’s insistence on a broad liberal arts education brought Ruth to courses in Biology where she is said to have encountered the physiologist, Professor Anton Carlson, and was so taken by his course in Physiology that she switched her major to Biology and her concentration to Physiology. She found all her science courses stimulating and at first thought medicine would be a career choice.

Having received her B.S. (Phi Beta Kappa) from the University in 1938, Ruth spent the War years first as a secretary and later in a graduate program at Rutgers University where she participated in a wartime research project. She obtained a Masters degree in Plant Physiology in 1944. The thesis title for the degree was “Nutritional Status of the Tomato Seedling in Relation to Successful Transplanting.”

The taste of research and her duties as a teaching assistant at Rutgers convinced her that a life of laboratory research and teaching was her true calling, so she enrolled in 1945 for a Ph.D. at Columbia University and wisely selected Genetics as her field. Professor Marcus M. Rhoades was her thesis advisor and the genetics of corn her special area. It proved her good fortune to have selected an area graced by one Barbara McClintock, who along with Professor Rhoades strongly influenced Ruth’s scientific development.

A Merck fellowship awarded for a postdoctoral period with Dr. Sam Granick, a microbiologist at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, permitted Ruth to spend the summer at the Hopkins Marine Station at Pacific Grove, California. There she took the highly regarded course of Professor Van Niel as a first step in preparation for her planned change of focus to microorganisms. Her intention was to concentrate on the chloroplast and with the help of Professor Van Niel and Professor Gilbert Morgan Smith, she selected the single-celled flagellated alga Chlamydomonas reinhardi as the focus of her research.

At the termination of her fellowship with Dr. Granick, Dr. Sager continued her work on the chloroplast as a staff member at the Rockefeller Institute until 1955, when she moved to Columbia as a research associate and later (60-66) as a senior research scientist in the Zoology Department. Her time spent in the laboratory of Professor Francis Ryan made for a rich exchange and led to her most productive research on chloroplast DNA and ribosomes. In addition Ruth and Professor Ryan collaborated on the successful textbook “Cell Heredity” which they published in 1961.

In the first decade of the 20th Century Carl Correns found in his studies with Mirabilis jalapa var, albomaculata, the four-o’clock plant, that chloroplast traits such as greenness are not all transmitted according to the rules of Gregor Mendel. Instead, such characters are inherited only from the maternal parent. It was suggested that the trait was passed along through chloroplasts. Such a suggestion implied that these organelles had an independent genetic system. This was implication, not evidence. At mid-century many geneticists, including some very influential scientists, were almost dismissively doubtful that such an independent system existed.

Ruth started on a course of research that led to her demonstrating that uniparental inheritance really does occur. Guided by contemporary work in microbial genetics, she generated streptomycin-resistant mutants of Chlamydomonas and, by making the appropriate crosses, determined that one of these mutations was inherited from only one of the two Chlamydomonas mating types. Then she isolated additional mutants with uniparentally-transmitted traits and proceeded to establish a genetic linkage map for them by cleverly finding a way to temporarily block uniparental inheritance! This work showed that non-Mendelian uniparental inheritance is real and that there are two independent genetic systems in Chlamydomonas (we now know that there are three). The knowledge that some chloroplast functions were blocked by the very antibiotics to which resistance could be shown in some of Ruth Sager’s uniparental mutants, strongly suggested that the uniparental genetic system was associated with chloroplasts. Firm evidence for this association came with the identification of DNA as the genetic material in 1953, the unequivocal demonstration of the presence of DNA in chloroplasts in the early 1960s, and the physical identification of specific chloroplast genes in the 1970s. After showing that the uniparental genetic system exists alongside the nuclear genome, Ruth Sager went on in the 1960s and early 1970s to investigate the mechanism for uniparental inheritance of chloroplast genes. Her second book, “Cytoplasmic Genes and Organelles”, published in 1972, was the culmination of two decades of her pioneering work on the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardi.

Her work was marked by boldness, originality, thoughtfulness, and enthusiasm. It brought her great pleasure, which she graciously shared with those who knew her.

Ruth was born in Chicago on February 7, 1918. She was one of three daughters of Deborah and Leon Sager. Ruth graduated from New Trier High School in Winnetka, Illinois, at the age of 16 and entered the University of Chicago. Her parents were very appreciative of literature and the arts and it was natural for Ruth to consider those fields options for her college major. In fact throughout her life she enjoyed collecting art, especially modern art in later years. In 1944 she married Seymour Melman, an economist, and in 1973 was married a second time to Arthur Pardee, a marriage that fostered mutual stimulation of their scientific endeavors.

It’s hard to believe that despite her productivity and the exciting revelations of her research, Ruth was not given a faculty position until 1966, 18 years after receiving her Ph.D. Hunter College then recruited her as a Professor of Biology. For some time Ruth had become interested in the genetics of cancer and accepted a Guggenheim research fellowship in 1972 to spend a year at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratory in London. That year with support from the Director, Dr. Michael Stoker, she initiated the transition from chloroplasts to cancer.

In 1975 Ruth was invited to join the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics at the Harvard Medical School as a Professor of Cellular Genetics with laboratories at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. At the Dana-Farber she was Chief of the Division of Cancer Genetics.

The move to the Dana-Farber and Harvard provided the setting for her second research career. With a number of postdoctoral colleagues and fellows she set about to develop evidence in support of her conviction that normal suppressor genes were as important as oncogenes in the transformation events leading to malignancy. Ruth was among the first to study the role of mutations in suppressor genes that neutralized their restraint on cell reproduction. She further hypothesized that genes of normal cells that contributed to controlled growth and replication could lose that function by regulatory changes that reduced their expression. In fact she and her research group identified several genes whose mRNA levels were sharply reduced in breast cancer cells. Ruth termed this phenomenon “Expression Genetics”.

Despite the heavily indulged interest in oncogenes at the time, Ruth championed the notion that tumorigenicity was more likely to be multigenic. A series of experiments with cell hybrids or cybrids that resulted in the suppression of the tumor cell phenotype strongly supported her suspicion that suppressor genes were important and probably several such genes are involved.

Ruth’s potential and accomplishments were recognized early. She was elected to Phi Beta Kappa (1938), Sigma Xi (1947), Merck Fellowship (1949), Guggenheim (1972), Schneider Memorial Lecture Award (1973), National Academy of Sciences (1977), American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1978), Institute of Medicine (1992), Princess Takamatsu Award Japan (1992).

Ruth’s membership in scientific organizations included: The International Society for Cell Biology, The American Society for Cell Biology, the Genetics Society of America, the American Society of Naturalists, the American Society of Biological Chemists and Molecular Biologists. Her numerous committee assignments were NIH study sections, NSF Presidential Young Investigator Award Panel, National Advisory Council on Aging, and the Scientific Advisory Board of the Friedrich Miescher Institute of Basel, Switzerland. The breadth of her active participation in the scientific endeavor attests to her wide ranging interest in the Biological, Biomedical Sciences.

Throughout her career Ruth maintained a sharp focus on the areas of her own research and a companion concern for the direction and support of science and of candidates for scientific careers. She was an excellent and often a lone model for women attracted to scientific careers although she was not a visible feminist. Science was a major but not the only element of her life as she maintained an interest in music, literature, theatre, art and the art of cuisine with that same infectious enthusiasm she displayed for science.

Of her career as a scientist Ruth was quoted as saying: “Science is very demanding. You have to really love it. Science is a way of life. I think it all comes from inside. It really gets to the very core of your existence. It is much like being an artist or a dancer.”

Respectfully submitted,

Dr. Harold Amos, Chairperson
Dr. Lawrence Bogorad
Dr. Lan Bo Chen
Dr. Ruth Craig
Dr. Ann Hochschild
Dr. Roberto Kolter
Dr. Charles Stiles