|
|
|
|
Faculty of Arts and Sciences To Vote on Revisions to Core Program
By Debra Bradley Ruder Gazette Staff The Faculty of Arts and Sciences expects to vote next week on a set of proposals that would add quantitative reasoning to the Core Curriculum and increase the number of courses in the program, thus enhancing student choice. In many meetings, phone conversations, and e-mails over the past few weeks, faculty have discussed the draft legislation developed by the Core Review Committee, a faculty-student body that has been examining the general education program. At the Faculty's May 6 meeting, some members expressed support for the proposals, some offered slight modifications, and one suggested an alternative to the Core Program. Dean of the Faculty Jeremy R. Knowles said he strongly supported the evolution and adaptation of the Core as put forth by the Review Committee. The Committee proposes adding a course requirement in quantitative reasoning, raising the number of Core study areas from 10 to 11. In addition, the Committee has sought to expand the number of Core courses to give students more choice. It proposes that the Standing Committee and its subcommittees, which review Core offerings, seek out departmental courses that may be appropriate for inclusion. The proposal represents a middle ground in the ongoing debate over whether departmental courses should count for Core credit, according to Professor Sidney Verba, Core Review Committee chair. "We have found that while the Faculty appears generally in favor of maintaining the basic character of the Core Program, it is divided -- rather sharply -- between those who prefer to increase the number of courses by substituting unvetted departmental courses for Core courses, and those who believe that such a departure will undermine the Core by reducing faculty incentives to teach in the Program," Verba wrote. The Committee suggests maintaining the number of required Core courses at eight, rather than the seven it had proposed in a working paper released in March. It also recommends that the Dean and the Standing Committee identify ways to speed up the process for reviewing proposed Core courses, and that the Dean take steps to provide incentives for faculty to teach in the Core. Professor of Romance Languages and Literatures Mary Gaylord believes the Core should be modified to accommodate students who want to explore subjects in more depth. (Core courses are designed for those with no background in a particular subject.) Agreeing with Gaylord, Judith Ryan, the Robert K. and Dale J. Weary Professor of German and Comparative Literature, compared her Core classes to one-room schoolhouses, where students of varying levels of knowledge converge. K. Anthony Appiah, professor of Afro-American studies and of philosophy, is one of many faculty who applaud the quantitative reasoning proposal. Such skills, he noted, are critical for understanding such phenomena as gentrification, sentencing patterns, and the spread of disease. Harvey Mansfield, the William R. Kenan Jr. Professor of Government, made the case for a "Great Books" curriculum by reading a lengthy passage from a report by the Student Committee on Undergraduate Requirements. Some professors said they favor adding small, faculty-led courses to the Core, while others questioned whether that was feasible or necessary. A number of faculty voiced support for a language requirement. "To know well another language and culture is a fundamental requirement of the humanities and of humanism itself," argued Gregory Nagy, the Francis Jones Professor of Classical Greek Literature and professor of comparative literature. Political scientist Stanley Hoffmann, a native of Vienna and the Paul and Catherine Buttenwieser University Professor, said he has been waiting 40 years for a language requirement. Applause followed Jay Harris' suggestion that the Faculty examine the undergraduate curriculum as a whole. Harris, the Harry Austryn Wolfson Professor of Jewish Studies, is concerned about the fact that students take a limited number of electives and declare their concentrations as freshmen. "Students are choosing concentrations more or less out of high school," he said. In other business, Dean Knowles announced the newly elected members of the Faculty Council: Peter Buck (History of Science), Melissa Franklin (Physics), Warren Goldfarb (Philosophy), Michael Hasselmo (Psychology), Caroline Hoxby (Economics), and Richard Thomas (Classics.) He also thanked the faculty whose Council terms end this spring -- Daniel Donoghue, Ellen Fitzpatrick, Joseph Koerner, Donald Pfister, and Mary Waters -- and those who served replacement terms this year, Reinhold Brinkmann, Patrick Ford, Michael Hasselmo, and Shannon Jackson. In addition, the Rev. Peter J. Gomes asked for a frank discussion about the "erosion" of the reading period, which has become shorter and apparently is used for some classes and tests. Knowles said the Committee on Undergraduate Education and the Educational Policy Committee would address this topic in the fall.
Copyright 1998 President and Fellows of Harvard College |