| |







|
|
HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
Fat Acquitted as a Risk Factor in Breast Cancer
By William J. Cromie
Gazette Staff
Whatever else it may do, eating fatty food won't increase your risk of getting
breast cancer.
That's the conclusion of researchers at the School of Public Health (SPH)
and the Medical School who participated in the largest study to date on
the association between fat in the diet and a cancer that kills more than
46,000 women and men each year.
"We looked at the results of seven studies, which included more than
335,000 women in four countries," said David Hunter, associate professor
of epidemiology at SPH. "No reduction in risk was found at levels of
fat intake far below the average in the United States, or for saturated
versus unsaturated fat. Therefore, it appears unlikely that a reduction
in total fat consumption by middle-aged and older women will substantially
reduce their chances of getting breast cancer."
According to the American Cancer Society, about 186,000 women and 1,000
men will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year.
Fat Controversy
This research goes a long way toward settling a controversy that has gone
on for more than 50 years. Several previous studies found a positive link
between fat intake and increased risk of breast cancer. These investigations,
however, involved asking women about their diet after they developed the
disease.
Such results can be biased by inaccurate recall of what was eaten. "The
experience of being diagnosed with, and treated for, breast cancer may well
alter a women's recall of her past diet," Hunter notes.
He and his colleagues looked only at studies in which large samples of healthy
women were followed for as long as seven years to determine who got the
cancer. The investigation covered females from the United States, Canada,
the Netherlands, and Sweden whose fat intake ranged from less than 20 to
more than 30 percent of calories eaten. (The average in this country is
33 percent.) The women, who ranged in age from 28 to 90 years, included
Adventists in California and more than 89,000 participants in Harvard's
long-running Nurses' Health Study.
Almost 5,000 of the women got breast cancer. However, their disease was
not linked to total, saturated, monosaturated, polyunsaturated, animal,
or vegetable fat, or cholesterol levels.
"The study comes as close as one can get to showing that fat intake
is not related to the incidence of breast cancer," Hunter maintains.
It is possible to do a more accurate test by following two groups of women,
one that limits fat intake to 20 percent or less of calories and one that
does not. Such a study, the Women's Health Initiative, is now under way,
but findings are not expected until the end of the century.
The present study showed no reduction in breast cancer at the 20 percent
level, and other studies in China found no significant relationship even
at levels as low as 15 percent.
Although women can feel less guilty about enjoying an occasional cheeseburger
and fries, no physician would advise wild abandon at the dinner table. Fat
is still a major factor in other malignancies such as colon cancer, and
a suspect in heart disease and diabetes.
"There is good evidence that reducing red meat, dairy products, and
other sources of fat protects men and women against colon cancer,"
Hunter says.
Details of the research were reported in today's edition of The New England
Journal of Medicine by Hunter and 17 co-authors from Harvard-affiliated
and other institutions in four states and four countries.
Copyright
1998 President and Fellows of Harvard College
|